vivianimbriotis | Aug. 13, 2025, 7:04 p.m.
The Riley model is a lie for children, in which the lung is conceptualized as consisting of three populations of alveoli:
In this model, we can calculate two related terms:
NB in the real world, the alveolar "dead space" actually includes some poorly or imperfectly perfused alveoli (i.e. with a V/Q > 1) and the "shunt fraction" includes poorly or imperfectly ventilated alveoli (V/Q < 1).
Nonetheless, sticking with the Riley model, how would we go about finding these quantities?
Here are the steps
The key insight is that ALL of the CO2 in the mixed gas came from the alveolar gas, and none came from the dead space. That is, the CO2 content in mixed expiratory gas equals the CO2 content in the alveolar gas, i.e. the tidal volume less the dead space. That is:
$${CO_2}_{breath} = P_ACO_2 \cdot \overbrace{(V_T - V_D)}^{\text{alveolar gas}} = P_{\bar{E}}CO_2 \cdot V_T$$
$$V_T - V_D = \frac{P_{\bar{E}}CO_2 \cdot V_T}{P_ACO_2}$$
$$1 - \frac{V_D}{V_T} = \frac{P_{\bar{E}}CO_2}{P_ACO_2}$$
$$\frac{V_D}{V_T} = 1 - \frac{P_{\bar{E}}CO_2}{P_ACO_2}$$
Or, if you prefer to think in terms of alveolar ventilation and minute volume, we can do this:
$$\frac{V_D \cdot RR}{V_T \cdot RR} = 1 - \frac{P_{\bar{E}}CO_2}{P_ACO_2}$$
$$\frac{1 - V_A}{MV} = 1 - \frac{P_{\bar{E}}CO_2}{P_ACO_2}$$
$$\frac{V_A}{MV} = \frac{P_{\bar{E}}CO_2}{P_ACO_2}$$
Now we can't usually measure \(P_ACO_2\), but we can measure the arterial CO2 tension \(P_aCO_2\), and unless there's a large shunt, those are close enough together for government work.
$$\frac{V_A}{MV} = \frac{P_{\bar{E}}CO_2}{P_aCO_2}$$
Here are the steps:
Let's consider the oxygen content in these samples. Let \(C_aO_2\) be the oxygen content of the arterial sample, \(C_vO_2\) be the oxygen content of mixed venous (or shunted) blood, and \(C_pO_2\) be the oxygen content of blood in the pulmonary capillaries. Let Qp, Qs, and CO be the pulmonary capillary flow, shunt flow, and cardiac output respectively.
We wish to find
$$Fs = \frac{Q_s}{CO}$$
We have two relationships, refering to total flow and total oxygen flux:
$$CO = Q_p + Q_s $$
$$C_aO_2 \cdot CO = C_pO_2 \cdot Q_p + C_vO_2 \cdot Q_s$$
So diving by CO we have
$$C_aO_2 = \frac{C_pO_2 \cdot Q_p}{CO} + C_vO_2 \cdot F_s$$
And then using the total flow equation
$$C_aO_2 = C_pO_2 \frac{CO - Q_s}{CO} + C_vO_2 \cdot F_s$$
$$C_aO_2 = C_pO_2 \cdot (1 - F_s) + C_vO_2 \cdot F_s$$
$$C_aO_2 = C_pO_2 - C_pO_2 \cdot F_s + C_vO_2 \cdot F_s$$
$$(C_aO_2 - C_pO_2) = (C_vO_2- C_pO_2) \cdot F_s$$
$$F_s = \frac{C_aO_2 - C_pO_2}{C_vO_2- C_pO_2}$$
or equivalently
$$F_s = \frac{C_pO_2 - C_aO_2}{C_pO_2 - C_vO_2}$$
We can find some intuitive results from this relationship. If the shunt fraction is zero, then the numerator is zero, so the arterial blood is the same as ideal pulmonary capillary blood. If the shunt fraction is one, then:
$$F_s = 1 = \frac{C_pO_2 - C_aO_2}{C_pO_2 - C_vO_2}$$
$$C_pO_2 - C_aO_2 = C_pO_2 - C_vO_2$$
$$C_aO_2 = C_vO_2$$
...the arterial blood looks just like mixed venous blood, and no gas exchange has happened.
Okay, but how on earth do we figure out these oxygen contents? These refer to the total amount of oxygen in the blood. Oxygen can either be carried as a dissolved gas (in which case we can measure its partial pressure) or bound to haemoglobin. The maximum amount of oxygen carried by a gram of haemoglobin is around 3.9 ml/g. So:
$$C_{O_2} = (3.9 \cdot ceHb \cdot sO_2) + 0.03 \cdot P_aO_2$$
Where \(ceHb\) is the effective haemoglobin concerntration in g/L (effective meaning less dyshaemoglobinaemias like methaemoglobin or carboxyhaemoglobin). We assume that the sats in the pulmonary capillary blood are 100%.
Usually the term for dissolved gas is neglibile, except in weird situations (100% FiO2 with anaemia; or hyperbaric therapy), so we can limit ourselves to
$$C_{O_2} = 3.9 \cdot ceHb \cdot sO_2$$
This good approximation reduces our shunt equation to
$$F_s = \frac{1 - S_aO_2}{1 - S_{\bar{v}}O_2}$$
So for example, with mixed venous sats of 70%, and arterial saturations of 88%, we find:
$$F_s = \frac{1 - 0.88}{1 - 0.7}$$
$$F_s = 40\%$$
Mid-twenties lost cause.
Trapped in a shrinking cube.
Bounded on the whimsy on the left and analysis on the right.
Bounded by mathematics behind me and medicine in front of me.
Bounded by words above me and raw logic below.
Will be satisfied when I have a fairytale romance, literally save the entire world, and write the perfect koan.